Friday, November 23, 2018

Stan Lee, 1922 - 2018

There was a time, back in the late 1980s and 1990s, when it became a chic thing, something one did as a truly exceptional, erudite comic book reader who knew industry history and nuance, to heap criticism and scorn on Stan Lee.

Stan was an egotistical bastard, the reasoning went: he selfishly never gave Steve Ditko or Jack Kirby credit for helping invent Spider-Man, the Fantastic Four, et al. He callously wouldn't Give Kirby his original art pages. For years he toured the country, speaking at colleges like some kind of goddamn celebrity, happily presenting himself as the face of Marvel Comics, taking all the credit for the Marvel Universe, as though there weren't dozens of other people who had an equally important hand in what was a spontaneous happening in the early 60s, not some scheme, shrewdly devised by Lee to conquer a comic book industry still reeling from the implementation of the Comics Code Authority.

But to subscribe to this line of sanctimonious, simplistic judgement is to fall into the same kind of well-intentioned but ultimately self-defeating, revisionist PC nonsense that the Founding Fathers were just oppressive, old white men, whose roll in American history should be seen as merely a footnote of sorts.

It is also to willfully ignore the fact that everyone involved in the Silver Age of comic books - not just Stan Lee - had faults and failings, and behaved like what they all really were: hungry men and women, trying to eke out a living in an industry that had never been taken seriously, who were as surprised as anyone when the characters populating the comic books coming out of 655 Madison Avenue started shifting serious units, something Marvel publisher Martin Goodman could only have dreamed about just four years earlier, when his comic book empire teetered on the edge of collapse.

Steve Ditko, of course, tops the list of strange personalities that forged Marvel's turnaround in the early 1960s. An Ayn Rand fanatic whose obsession with and devotion to Objectivism dominated his later work, the aloof, taciturn artist who drew the first 38 issues of Amazing Spider-Man, and gave Dr. Strange his ethereal vibe of psychedelic unreality, abruptly left Marvel in 1966, and lived the rest of his life (he just died in June of this year) refusing to grant a formal interview.

Jack Kirby, who had logged nearly 50 years in the industry by the time he started his well-publicized fight with Lee over ownership of his original art and credit as a co-creator of the titles he worked on with Lee, already knew how cutthroat the comic book business was. He certainly deserved his art and co-creator credit on all those books, but the notion that he was an innocent, wronged by the merciless Stan Lee, is shortsighted and one-dimensional. (In fact, Kirby had been involved in the losing end of a lawsuit with DC comics' editor Jack Schiff just prior to his arrival at Marvel in 1958.)

The denouement of this suddenly fashionable pursuit of trash talking Lee came in the form of The Comics Journal #181 (October 1995), with their cover story "Step Right Up! The Three Ring Career of: Stan Lee." Never an obsequious industry mouthpiece, the Journal's Gregory Cwiklik wrote a critical - but fair - piece about Lee, followed by a juvenile hatchet job by Paul Wardle. Other sections dealt with Lee and Kirby - natch' - and in another section, artists, writers and editors weighed in about their relationships or dealings with Lee.

So, in case you were wondering, or still hadn't gotten the news yet, The Comics Journal wanted to make it plain and simple for you: Lee may have made himself out to be an important, avuncular character in the comic book industry, but there are many reasons why you should consider not liking him.

Stan Lee was a flawed human being, same as the rest of us. He almost certainly let much of Marvel's 60s and 70s success go to his head. He never gave the artists at Marvel in the 60s half the credit they were due, and he should have humbly given Kirby what he wanted in the 80s without any fuss. A lot of the barbed criticism he endured over the last 40 years is deserved.

But it is garish understatement to say that Stan Lee's negative attributes were far, far outweighed by his positives. Stanley Martin Lieber was an American treasure. Although known primarily for his work in the 1960s co-creating the famous Marvel superheroes that presently populate the wildly successful Marvel Cinematic Universe, Lee's fingerprints are all over the whole of comic book history.

Barely a year after Action #1 launched comic books' Golden Age, Lee was hired on - through a family connection - to Martin Goodman's fledgling Timely Comics in 1939, happy to be off the mean streets of Depression-era New York City. And accusations of nepotism would certainly be fair if the sixteen-year-old Lee had done nothing but twiddle his thumbs and collect a paycheck from Goodman. But instead, he did everything: He did odd jobs around the office. Then he wrote text filler stories in Captain America Comics (the kind that allowed comic book publishers to save money and send their subscriptions second class mail, the same rate assigned to magazines). Then he co-created some lesser known superheroes like Jack Frost. Then he fell into the role of editor at Timely after the departure of Joe Simon and Jack Kirby.

Anyone else would've been happy having all of this as a résumé. But that was just Stan Lee's warm-up act. At 35 years of age, he was very nearly the last man standing at what was then known as Atlas Comics, after the Atlas Implosion - otherwise known as Martin Goodman's disastrous distribution deal with American News Company - left Goodman and Lee as virtually its only employees.

Something happening down the street at rival National Periodical Publications (DC, whom now, in fact, distributed Goodman's comic book line, their draconian contract allowing Atlas only eight titles per month, a sliver of National's output) gave Lee, four years after the Implosion, the opportunity to turn his creativity loose: Robert Kanigher and Carmine Infantino revamped The Flash in Showcase #4.

Superhero comics fell on hard times after World War II, but the new Flash and National's very popular Justice League of America made them popular all over again. Martin Goodman, whose business acumen for decades had consisted of simply hopping on bandwagons, told Lee, "maybe we ought to do some superheroes." The result, with the help of Kirby and Ditko, was what Lee enjoyed calling The Marvel Age of Comics. Spider-Man, The Avengers, Iron Man, The Hulk - every famous Marvel character sprang from this fertile period when the imaginative Lee and his endlessly talented artistic staff let their imaginations run wild.

Lee started his career at the dawn of the comic book industry, rode it through its golden age when the most popular titles sold millions of copies, persevered through the dark days of Wertheim, Kefauver, and self-censorship, helped revitalized it in the 1960s, and was there when Marvel declared bankruptcy and the industry petered out at the end of the century, turning their superhero comic books into an expense, as Rob Salkowitz wrote, "required to keep the intellectual property assets current and the trademarks up to date."

Stan lived through it all, playing an integral part in creating and developing the characters that now bring in billions of dollars for Marvel Studios. He was proud to see the characters he scripted decades earlier become the dominant force in the movie industry, and he should have been. His co-creations reach into every corner of the globe, entertaining and inspiring millions of boys and girls, men and women, decade after decade.

It was amusing reading the above-mentioned issue of The Comics Journal again all these years later, remembering the folly of Alvin Boretz and even Lou Ferrigno, the years when Donner's Superman reigned supreme and Marvel could do no right on TV or in the movies. For his article in the Journal, Cwiklik wrote "Over the years, a well deserved source of embarrassment for the Marvel organization has been its continuing failure to successfully put onto film any of their popular characters in a form that does justice to them. There has been a succession of unerringly juvenile and/or inane cartoon and TV adaptations and at least one film so bad it's hard to find even on video."

Twenty years later and the tables are turned. It is DC that struggles in the motion picture world, and Marvel whose movies - featuring Stan Lee's co-creations - have attracted an enormous, rabid fan base, and regularly rake in truly obscene sums of money.

Were you one of those ignorant malcontents twenty five years ago saying Stan was a creep? You're not terribly bright. RIP, Stan. Thank you for turning superheroes on their collective head and giving us - with Kirby, Ditko, Wallace Wood, et al - our favorite, most enduring characters. The acrimony from all those years ago has dissipated, and you're widely remembered as someone who showed all of us who grew up reading Marvel Comics how tremendous life can get.

As it should be.


Sunday, October 21, 2018

The End Of History

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Sunday, October 14, 2018

It’s Time to Reconsider… “Omega Man,” by The Police


Editor’s note: Welcome to the inaugural edition of “It’s Time to Reconsider…,” a new column wherein individual Ranting Russell staffers reconsider something Ye Editor thinks was of consequence at some point in humanity’s brief existence, but hasn’t gotten much airtime lately. Unlike other RR articles, staff doesn’t get to choose the subject matter; Ye Ed chooses a topic, assigns a staffer, and off we go. For this first time out, old-time RR writer Sheridan Rowan – a lifelong Police fan – takes on “Omega Man,” guitarist Andy Summers’ lone contribution to the fourth Police Album, Ghost in the Machine.

*****

It’s kind of odd that Renee asked me to write about Omega Man. I did have a few beers at the Horny Toad Pub and Grub the other night and mentioned the fact that I loved this song as a kid, and hadn’t listened to it in a long damn time, which doesn’t exactly make me a Police expert, but what the crap. I suppose it doesn’t matter.

The title of this piece could just as well be “It’s Time to Reconsider Ghost in the Machine.” The album, released in late 1981, marked a departure for The Police. The new wave trio, consisting of
bassist/vocalist/primary songwriter Sting, drummer Stewart Copeland, and guitarist Andy Summers, released three albums between 1978 and 1980, all of which sported exotic-sounding titles and consisted of guitar/bass/drums arrangements.

A latecomer to the Police camp, Andy Summers brought ten more years’ worth of much-needed experience to the band, acting as a buffer of sorts between the constantly bickering bassist and drummer, and possessed the depth of musicianship that Sting craved beyond the punk rock chops utilized by original Police guitarist Henri Padovani.

Their fourth album landed in record stores with a conspicuously English title, and for the first time ever didn’t feature a band picture on the cover. The title track was also heavy on the synthesizers, an indulgence for what had been a band lacking (more or less) in pretense up until that point.

Despite his enormous ego, Sting magnanimously consented to recording the odd Stewart and/or Andy songs every now and again, leading to much head-scratching (and even some resentment from his bandmates) when Andy’s Behind My Camel, included on side two of 1980’s Zenyatta Mondatta, won a Grammy in 1982 for “Best Rock Instrumental Performance.”

Feeling suitably validated (and perhaps feeling his jackass bandmates owed him; Sting admitted to burying Camel’s master in a garden behind the studio), Summers returned the following year with Omega Man, a song that I initially considered my favorite on the album.

Omega Man was the fifth-best song out of the album’s eleven tunes. It's verses were made to order for Sting's vocals, and changing the time signature up on the chorus was a masterstroke. That's a not-bad showing for Summers, considering he played guitar in a band band fronted by one of the 80’s most revered songwriters. But Ghost in the Machine was the first Police album that found Sting - in my estimation, anyway - struggling to maintain the high quality of Regatta de Blanc (their finest hour) and Zenyatta Mondatta (their second-finest hour).

Ghost’s main flaw is its homogenous feel, and the blame falls squarely on Mr. Gordon Sumner. The band had always dabbled in reggae and funk rhythms and chords, but there was always plenty to distinguish one song from the next. For Ghost, the egocentric bassist give his bandmates eight new songs, four of which – Hungry for You, Demolition Man, Too Much Information, and One World (Not Three) – seemed to blend in together. Music journalist Vic Garbarini characterized the like-sounding songs as “one-chord jams,” but really, they’re one-part jams. Listened to by themselves, each one is a good song (what heterosexual woman doesn't want Sting, ca. 1981, singing "I'm still hungry for you" to her in French?). But even though these four songs comprise less than one half of the album, their sameness permeates the record like a virus, ultimately defining it. Did the band mean to spread them out so evenly? Two are on side one, two are on side two.

And that’s precisely what lies at the heart of the matter. Back then I loved a fifth-best-song-out-of-eleven for that very reason: the new Police album had a blandness about it, and it was guitarist Andy Summers who shook it up, showing up (in my mind, anyway) the band’s chief songwriter, delivering the album’s only truly rocking song just one year after a bizarre instrumental that didn’t rock in the slightest.

And yet, wading deep into Ghost in the Machine for the first time in years here in 2018, I find the need to contradict some of what I just wrote. Listening to each of the one-part songs separately from the album, they're all quite good - I'm enjoying them way more as a middle-age woman than as a teenage girl. Demolition Man in particular resonates in a big way, with some killer Sting lyrics ("Tied to the chair and the bomb is ticking - this situation was not of your picking," plus the entire chorus) and a song-length lead from Summers. And in the midst of the current sad state of domestic and global affairs, I can't help rewinding the fourth verse to Rehumanize Yourself ("Billy's joined the National Front, he always was a little runt, he's got his hand in the air with the other cunts, you've got to humanize yourself") over and over again.

So where does Omega Man fit in now? Strangely, I'm no longer nearly as keen on the album's most rocking song. The verses strike me as flat, not nearly as nuanced as what's going on in the aforementioned Demolition Man or Spirits in the Material World. It's not a bad bit of filler, but I can't help thinking what a better album Ghost would've been if the B-side to the Spirits in the Material World - Low Life - had been on side two, and Omega Man had been a B-side instead. And need I elaborate on how disappointed I was to find out it’s not based on the Boris Sagal movie of the same name?

Interestingly, Andy Summers returned two years later with the best song on Synchronicity, truly upstaging Sting as The Police disintegrated. For a different article, perhaps.



Mailbag!

Dear Janet Wamboldt, of Seymour IN:

Thank you for your question about The Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 50th Anniversary Deluxe Box Set.

We chose not to run a review of the set out of respect for Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr, the two remaining Beatles. You refer to it as a "masterpiece," making it very likely that we do not dig this album as much as you do.

The nifty thing about the set is Giles Martin's remix truly is worth listening to. Even the most cynical members of the Ranting Russell staff appreciate how it almost sounds like you're listening to the band performing the album live. By itself, this is a perfectly lovely addition to anyone's Beatles collection.

What is certainly not nifty about the set is that Sgt. Pepper's is the fourth most overrated album of all time (#1: Exile on Main Street; #2: Tommy; #3: London Calling), and going through the trouble of remixing it, putting out myriad different versions with various extras, the biggest of which - the 4 CD Deluxe Edition - costs $124 on amazon as we write this, a shameful fleecing of fans who have already made Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr rich beyond anything the normal human mind can begin to conceptualize, is a colossal waste of time. Our staff has never understood why Sgt. Pepper's more often than not winds up as the #1 album of all time on all those silly Greatest Albums of All Time lists.

It has A Day in the Life, of course, which is right up there, but there are three songs that don't even rate as decent filler (She's Leaving Home, When I'm 64, Lovely Rita), which automatically disqualifies it from any "top" lists. The pedantic blowhards at Rolling Stone magazine once wrote that Sgt. Pepper's is "an unsurpassed adventure in concept, sound, songwriting, cover art and studio technology." But you see, just because your album is a concept album , and just because you do a lot of overdubs and record things backwards doesn't mean that your album is a work of genius. The album's cover is indeed iconic, and we're not so ignorant that we don't understand the impact the album had in 1967 and why, versus how it looks to us here in the 21st century, looking backwards across a far more visceral landscape.

There is certainly no denying great songs like Fixing a Hole, Getting Better, Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, and Within You Without You. And we admit, we all enjoyed listening to the different takes on discs two and three. It's not that we hate this record, it's just that they gave the deluxe, Cadillac treatment to an album that isn't The Beatles' best work. Consider: Strawberry Fields Forever and Penny Lane were recorded in the lead-up to Sgt. Pepper's. Make a playlist where you substitute Strawberry Fields for She's Leaving Home, and Penny Lane for When I'm 64. You could make the case that this is arguably The Beatles' best album.

But not with the album as it was released. This staff still grapples with where to put Sgt. Pepper's in a list ranking The Beatles' albums from best to worst. No one has it in their top five, and one Ranting Russell staffer puts it dead last ("gratuitous and overwrought," says she).

What would have had us salivating uncontrollably and shelling out $124 without a second thought is a Revolver Deluxe Box Set. Far and away the best Beatles album, Revolver features no less than five A-list songs, and the rest is first-rate filler. Even McCartney's syrupy Here, There and Everywhere is redeemed by gorgeous backing vocals, and Harrison's tuneful guitar playing in the middle eight. Famous for recording multiple takes of every song, The Beatles doubtlessly left behind hours of outtakes from the Revolver sessions, and we'd love to hear every second of it. (Ranting Russell founder Russell Bladh once groused that the great failing of The Beatles' Anthology CDs was that there were only six discs, and not twenty.)

Instead, we're left with a White Album Deluxe Box Set, to be released on November 9 (amazon is currently asking $138.74 for "pre-orders"). It's unfortunate that The Beatles braintrust didn't decide to start releasing massive fanboy box sets of Beatles records until the anniversary of Sgt. Pepper's, and not, say, Help! or Rubber Soul. But as our favorite renaissance man once said, these are the conditions that prevail.

Thank you for your letter, Janet. Keep reading Ranting Russell.




Saturday, June 30, 2018

Queen at 47, Part V


A NIGHT AT THE OPERA (November 1975)

“Let’s say, finally, that enchantment can really happen.”
- Daniel Nester


In August of 1975, Queen – with the help of Elton John’s manager John Reid – finally parted ways with Norman Sheffield and Trident Studios. No longer encumbered by a contract that held them prisoners under the thumb of their greedy managers, the band were free to stop worrying about living hand-to-mouth (by Freddie’s standards, anyway) and focus instead on Sheer Heart Attack’s follow-up.

As a result, Queen entered that marvelous mental state where the best of us are sometimes fortunate enough to find ourselves for a few fleeting moments, where a truly proper perspective is at long last deployed, oftentimes unwittingly: life’s petty trivialities fade into the ether and we realize life is a gift, and the universe’s vast infiniteness is to be embraced, not feared.

This is precisely where Queen resided in August of 1975. Of their break with Norman Sheffield, Brian May told Sounds’ John Ingham, “All the emotions came out in a big flood.”

For Freddie Mercury – he who sang Jesus’ praises on Queen’s first album, he who delighted in watching a fairy feller crack a nut at night’s noon-time on Queen II – the vitriol that had only been touched on in Flick of the Wrist from Sheer Heart Attack exploded almost uncontained during this big flood, and found expression in one of Freddie’s greatest songs, one of Queen’s greatest songs, and one of the most startling album-openers of all time: Death on Two Legs.

John Reid successfully negotiated Queen’s split with Trident, but not without some collateral damage. The band had to pay their former managers £100,000 plus one percent of royalties on the next six Queen albums. However, once Norman Sheffield caught wind of Death on Two Legs (with its none-too-subtle subtitle, “Dedicated to…”), he very nearly blew a gasket. Without putting up a fight, the band quietly shelled out a second advance against publishing to calm him down.

Norman Sheffield could be forgiven for feeling a smidge hurt when he heard Opera’s opening track. Death on Two Legs verily seethes with venom and contempt, propelled ruthlessly forward by some of the most incendiary guitar playing of May’s career. Starting rather beautifully in a minor key, Freddie’s gorgeous descending piano arpeggio is quickly overtaken by May’s guitars – three of ‘em, in fact: the heavy chords interrupting Freddie, the high notes that quickly feel like an ice pick in your brain, and the feedback starting at 0:30. At 0:38, right when this awful cacophony, this noise, is about to drive you to drink, everything STOPS, and Death On Two Legs’ main motif begins.

It’s stunning at first, hearing Freddie at the peak of his powers, one of the great rock’n’roll voices, strong and resonant, nailing all of the notes in the ambitious melodies he dreamt up in the months after recording Sheer Heart Attack. And he’s PISSED: this is not the same Freddie Mercury who poignantly pointed out that love can break your heart so suddenly on Queen II. Right out of the gate, the man is practically snarling his contempt for his unnamed antagonist, calling him a blood-sucking leach, a thief, an old mule (misguided, at that), and berating his narrow-minded cronies who are fools of the first division. Then the big Queen chorale voices come in, like something out of Aeschylus, truly (KILL JOY, BAD GUY – BIG TALKING SMALL FRY) and Freddie comes in again, jeering at this “old barrow-boy” to kiss his ass goodbye. Then the chorale suggests that suicide is a viable option for Freddie’s tormentor.

And here we’ve only just arrived at the song’s mid-way point. Channeling Freddie’s bile, 
Brian May plays a frantic, heavy lead over a lurching, start-stop G-flat (the chorale’s key), before stepping into an almost pleasant lead in D-major, which is quickly ended by Roger Taylor’s machine gun fire snare drum. If anything, Freddie’s even more pissed now - check out the indignation in Freddie’s voice when he sings “Talk like a big business tycoon – you’re just a hot-air balloon – so no one gives you a DAMN.” “Dog with disease,” Freddie continues, “you’re the king of the sleaze” before asking, “was that fin on your back part of the deal?” In case this isn’t unsubtle enough, Fred helps out, hissing “shark” in between Taylor pounding his toms.

And still there’s more, with the chorale castigating our beleaguered antagonist as a “sewer rat decaying in a cess pool of pride.” “Should be made unemployed,” Freddie sneers, “make yourself null and void,” evoking the Velvet Underground’s Heroin.

This may very well have been Queen’s best song up until this point, a truly blistering poison-pen letter casting the niceties of their first three albums into sharp relief. Here was proof, in fact, that they were one of the better bands to come along in years. The problem was, the band themselves seemed, not infrequently, keen to sabotage this fact. And I’m not talking about record sales. Because art cannot be quantified.

Once more, for the ignorant among us: art cannot be quantified. Baseball has a Hall of Fame. This makes perfect sense. If you play seven years with a career batting average of .215 and a fielding average of .880, you will not be elected into the Hall because you stink. You are mediocre. Awful, even. But if you play for 20 years, with a career batting average of .341 and a fielding average of .986, then you are probably on your way to the Hall. The numbers bear out your worthiness.

Although few seem to understand this, art is different. Van Gogh was virtually unknown in his time, but is now acknowledged as one of the greatest painters of all time. The Velvet Underground sold barely any records in their time, and are now acknowledged as one of the most influential bands of all time. (They were inducted into the “Rock and Roll Hall of Fame” in 1996 by Patti Smith, of all people, proving once again that the “Rock and Roll Hall of Fame” should be burned to the ground, and everyone who ever accepted their “induction,” and everyone who ever aided and abetted this process – like Smith – should have their kneecaps broken. It’s strange to think that The Sex Pistols, happy to tour whenever they need money, preying on everyone’s base desires for nostalgia, are the one and only band who ever refused to accept induction because they correctly perceive that the place is a sham, calling it a “piss stain.” Others have refused to show up out of animosity towards ex-bandmates, but only the Sex Pistols refused on artistic principle.)

So you cannot judge how good or lousy a band is by record sales. Queen went on to sell millions upon millions of records, amassing more money than God. Unquestionably they were talented enough – and shrewd enough – to understand the craft of writing catchy songs that would sell. But to those of us who actually care about music as an art form, there’s a larger discussion beyond just shifting units. Remember: Paul McCartney and Michael Jackson took Say Say Say all the way to #1 in the U.S., a song that still dredges up a certain strain of PTSD when I hear a snippet of it in an elevator. This wasn’t art, it was cynical commercialism. But Queen was art. Right?

It was no secret by 1975 that Queen was a band of giant egos, Freddie foremost among them, who held in very high regard approximately two things: money and fame. Their intrinsic talent, though, betrayed a band not of egomaniacs intent on ruling the world, but instead four enormously talented but deeply insecure kids who felt they had something to prove to the world. This strain of self-aggrandizement is a very young-man attitude, and it simultaneously worked very well for the band, driving them to always outdo themselves, and worked very badly for the band, because they took their critics way, way too seriously. (And, in turn, their critics delighted in taking them down a few pegs.) Queen themselves may never have understood this irony. Their confusion about it may have served to simply amplify their worst suspicions, perpetuating their paranoid worldview, inspiring them darkly to close ranks and keep hammering away at the very things that pissed off their critics, just to spite them.

Freddie Mercury was not stupid. He knew that what Queen was up to, especially with A Night at the Opera, went beyond cynical commercialism. And if he hadn’t been profoundly insecure, he would have said this in interviews. But harsh reviews of Queen II and even Sheer Heart Attack put him – and the rest of the band – permanently on the defensive. Hijacked by their insecurities, they yearned for artistic respect, and the press were only too eager to jump all over a band that took themselves so seriously. Disastrously, they took the attitude that they’d simply pre-empt their critics by pretending that somehow, it was the press – not they – who were getting worked up over nothing:

“I like to write songs for fun,” Freddie told Melody Maker in 1981, “for modern consumption. People can discard them like a used tissue afterwards. You listen to it, like it, discard it, then on to the next. Disposable pop, yes.”

Which was just the kind of desperate bullshit everyone who hated Queen wanted to hear the band cop to. And Freddie knew it. Conversely, this kind of talk only served to baffle fans who were arguing it really was art. We thought our heroes, the guys actually writing and playing the music, had our backs. Then here comes Freddie Mercury, the cat who wrote Killer Queen and Death On Two Legs – the big cheese himself – pulling the rug out from underneath us, stamping his endorsement on what the pedantic straights in the academia conjectured all along, since 1955; that this rock ’n’ roll stuff really is just silliness, and you’re better off growing out of it now, and going to college, getting a degree, marrying, a job, a mortgage, and pumping out two units. Fun times.

Death On Two Legs was not disposable pop, and neither was the rest of A Night at the Opera. But this was the narrative Freddie needed to insulate himself from the critics whom he allowed to take up way too much of his mental energy.

Unquestionably, Opera is a flawed masterpiece. The chorus to May’s Sweet Lady is dead on arrival, wasting some choice 70’s rock riffage on the verses. It’s charming to learn that the jazz band playing in Good Company, May’s bittersweet Dixieland jazz band-cum-ballad recounting a man’s journey from happy young man to married man to divorced, broken old man, is recreated entirely by May on his legendary Red Special. It’s amusing, aye, but still doesn’t add up to much more than a touch of amusing filler. Having Freddie’s Lazing on a Sunday Afternoon follow the unbridled malevolence of Death On Two Legs gives you a chance to catch your breath, what with it’s giddy music-hall silliness and all, but it’s somehow galling that Freddie never acknowledged its enormous debt to The Kinks’ Sunny Afternoon. The astute Queen fan will note that the band changes key for May’s guitar solo whimsy, a technique first deployed a year earlier on Stone Cold Crazy. It’s as though the band was frequently overtaken by restlessness, and moving the key up a step or two was the only way to arrest the fear that things were getting dull and needed to be stirred up a bit.

It’s easy to write off Freddie’s Seaside Rendezvous as mock-music hall nonsense, but damned if it isn’t impressive how he and Roger Taylor use their voices to almost precisely imitate a clarinet, kazoo, and brass. The backing vocals soar, and Freddie is wholly in his element here, making you wonder if joining a rock band was his first mistake all along. Placing it at the end of side one was a masterstroke. A lovely bit of filler relegated to the middle of the line-up, right where it’s supposed to live as a fetching little surprise, like finding a forgotten gift hidden under the tree after everyone’s done opening their presents on Christmas morning. (Editor’s note: popular music used to be released on LPs, or “vinyl,” which had two “sides.”)

Beyond those songs – all of which are well worth your time, it should be noted – the four members of Queen move from strength to strength, song to song, fleshing out and fulfilling the template established on Sheer Heart Attack: complex arrangements, beautiful melodies, transcendent harmonies, and songs with lots and lots of parts.

As the band’s last paean to Dungeons and Dragons prog rock nonsense, May’s The Prophet’s Song should be the worst song on the whole album. The ridiculous a cappella-opera nonsense commencing at 3:24 and running for a really, really long time all the way through 5:51 sounds suspiciously like little more than a jealous retort to Freddie’s Bohemian Rhapsody genius. And yet the rest of the song’s euphoric tunefulness inspires true wonderment, begging the question: why didn’t the guitarist write serious lyrics for this song? Have you listened to this thing recently? There are five strikingly gorgeous moments (at 0:45, 1:20, 1:39, 1:52, and 2:39) in a song that’s already intrinsically striking. Lyrics aside, this is Brian May firing on all cylinders. When the forgettable operatic middle finally ends, he lays down a fierce lead from 6:20 to 6:32, and everything culminates in a sort of vocal orgasm at 7:20. From there until 8:21 a somber guitar outro bleeds seamlessly into Freddie’s Love of My Life.


Queen wrote a whole, whole lot about love – falling in love, being destroyed by love, etc., so much so that it got very old in short order. But Love of my Life is Queen pre-cliché, a genuinely pretty Freddie song about loss and old age, its touching lyrics outdone by an astonishing arrangement that is just restrained enough, and a first-rate level of musicianship, exemplified by Freddie’s sublime deployment of rubato phrasing, first at 2:32, then again at 2:42. Here’s how locked in these guys were at this point: Brian May learned how to tune and play a fucking harp just for this one song. Freddie’s arrangement called for it, and there was no way the song would be a best-we-could-do proposition; the sounds swirling around inside the singer’s head had to be realized exactly as he heard them, and what was in his head this time around called for a harp.

Brian May, incidentally, has a Ph.D. in astrophysics. That’s why his time travel song – 39 – is infinitely more interesting than Interstellar, even though it was written nearly 20 years before the advent of CGI. Theoretical physicist Kip Thorne was an advisor for the film, which is nearly three hours long and is completely cancelled out by a ghastly stereotypically happy Hollywood ending. Brian May, on the other hand, needed no advisor for 39, needed less than four minutes to tell a story about leaving the planet and coming back to find everyone much older, and came up with something far more tuneful and enjoyable than Christopher Nolan ever could have hoped for. A tad on the dark side, 39 was reworked live into a festive singalong during the set’s acoustic portion.

In the midst of Freddie and Brian dominating Opera’s setlist, drummer Roger Taylor and bassist John Deacon asserted themselves as indispensible to the Queen cause, chipping in with two of the great Queen songs, I’m in Love with My Car and You’re My Best Friend, respectively.

Taylor claimed that Brian May thought his new song was a joke when he demoed it. The demo never surfaced on any Queen reissues, but what wound up on Opera is as tuneful as anything the band recorded in their entire career. Sprinkled throughout the unsubtle lyrics are plenty of ridiculous double entendres (“hand’s on your grease gun,” “I’m holding your wheel,” and so forth), made palpable by some tasty Brian May leads, and heaps of beautiful backing vocals.

While a little more reticent than Taylor to dip his toe in the songwriting pool, Deacon’s You’re My Best Friend – only the second song he wrote for the band – wound up a top-20 hit in the U.S., and became a staple of middle school and high school dances for years. Deacon wrote the song for his wife Veronica Tetzlaff, whom he would much later cheat on in plain sight with stripper Emma Shelley. But the loving marriage endured (or, at any rate, Tetzlaff grudgingly stuck it out with her husband through his midlife crisis), and the song itself is enduringly sweet, marvelously dated only by the Wurlitzer Electric Piano that Deacon himself plays. Brian May’s thoughtful lead towards song’s end proves that the guitarist was well aware that it takes more than playing a million notes a second to prove your genius on guitar. Instead of going the Satriani route, he holds back, trading in tons of notes for a minimalist, but totally melodic lead that suits the song, and Mercury’s attentive vocal, perfectly.

And lastly there’s Bohemian Rhapsody (“Bo Rhap” to die hards), Freddie’s six-minute magnum opus that spent nine weeks at #1 in the British charts during the 1976/1976-holiday season. Finding anything more to say about Queen’s signature song is an amusing exercise in futility, but it has been entertaining watching how the song went from a curiosity that critics gleefully savaged upon its release (“…Mostly pretty empty, all flash and calculation” – Time magazine; a “brazen hodgepodge” – Rolling StoneIt has no immediate selling point whatsover - Record Mirror) to one of the more revered songs in rock history. As happens not infrequently, the pedantic, narrow-minded, pretentious castigations of the music critics were roundly ignored by the millions of people who heard Bo Rhap and Freddie's undeniable genius, sending it to #1 in the UK for a record nine weeks, and to #9 in the US (upon being re-released in the early 90s, it once again went to #1 in the UK, and #2 in the US). Think of it as the Harry Truman of the rock world. Everyone from Kurt Cobain to Lady Ga Ga has talked about the impact Freddie had on his or her lives, proving once again that rock criticism should never, ever be taken seriously. How anyone writing for any music rag in 1975 could not be forever rocked by this song remains truly mystifying. Beautiful, rocking, sad, majestic, bombastic – these six minutes are everything we ever loved about Freddie in one song.

A Night at the Opera was an expensive gamble for the band that paid big dividends, going to number one in the UK and giving Queen their first top ten album in the U.S. Awash in worldwide fame, the band toured from late 1975 into the spring/summer of 1976, and dug in for the fall, wondering how they could possibly top themselves.